Ecoles-chercheurs

Research schools

Since 2015, DEPE has been working with its partners to organize research schools in the field of foresight and collective scientific expertise open to researchers and engineers from INRAE and other organizations (CNRS, CIRAD, IRD, IFREMER, Universities and French higher education establishments...).

Foresight

In the face of global change, foresight and scenario-building approaches are increasingly mobilized to organize discussion on possible futures and to build anticipation capacities. These research schools provide an opportunity to lay the foundations for a shared foresight culture, to explore the relationship between foresight and multidisciplinarity (territories, transitions, modeling, etc.), and to develop reflexivity on research projects and on the researcher's position in transdisciplinary systems.

The research schools are designed to demonstrate the value of foresight in building interdisciplinary dialogues. They can be illustrated by practical case studies using the scenario method.

Collective scientific assessment (CSA)

Collective scientific assessment (CSA) is a response to a request from public authorities for an assessment of scientific knowledge on a new, controversial or complex subject. This response relies on a multi-disciplinary committee of scientific experts who analyze the international bibliography and produce a synthesis of scientific knowledge useful for decision-making.  The use of collective scientific expertise has proved its worth and is becoming increasingly popular.  An increasing number of research institutions (Inserm, IRD, INRAE, CNRS...) have set up a department dedicated to the organization of expertise. However, at the same time, scientific expertise has become commonplace, arousing mistrust and even sometimes being contested.

The research schools aim to provide a better understanding of how collective scientific assessment relates to public policy, societal debate and research orientations. For example, it examines the differences between the role of researcher and that of expert; it discusses the principles and conditions of scientific appraisal; and it questions the sharing of scientific achievements, uncertainties, controversies and gaps.